Sir Francis Galton, 1822-1911, was an English Victorian era polymath: a statistician, sociologist, psychologist, anthropologist, tropical explorer, geographer, inventor, meteorologist, proto-geneticist, psychometrician and a proponent of social Darwinism, eugenics and scientific racism. (Wiki)

SIMPLE RECIPE FOR A LOW IQ POPULACE

PICK PEOPLE AT RANDOM – add “CRADLE-TO-GRAVE” SOCIAL SECURITY and generous dollops of “DIVERSITY ENRICHMENT” and MIX WELL..!   Although the resultant stew will look and taste awful, you will soon feel better about yourself for not being an odious racist..! 

Socialist-inspired welfare systems disproportionately benefit low IQ individuals and facilitates the opposite of Eugenics – DYSGENICS – the procreation of ever more lower IQ offspring..!   

Welfare statism is a form of government whereby the state protects and promotes the social and economic well being of its citizens based upon the principles of equal opportunity, equal distribution of wealth, and responsibility for those unable to have minimal provision for a standard living. (Wikipedia)

Mass 3rd world immigration is justified as a way to save the Ponzi-scheme pension systems of European countries.  But how will this work out when a majority of such immigrants disproportionately extract from the very state benefits they are supposed to contribute to?

Unemployed, low IQ single mothers (usually obese) are the biggest beneficiaries of welfare statism since not only do they get generous child benefit, they – along with 3rd world migrants – are prioritised for housing benefit (a rent-free flat), because the nanny state can’t bear the thought of young children living on the street.  Meanwhile unemployed men get NO housing benefit, which is why so many young men are street sleepers, but relatively few young women.  Therefore, a smart strategy for a homeless man is to befriend a single mother, move into her free flat and become the latest “daddy” to her brood, often from a string of low-IQ “boyfriend” sperm-donors.   At some point the sperm donor gets kicked out for alcohol or drugs abuse, an argument, or whatever.   The end product of such couplings is low-IQ offspring, which means ever more revenue diverted to the state benefits department.

Rinse and repeat this DYSGENIC formula and, hey presto, you end up with an ever-increasing population of long term “off-work” welfare dependents. 

The Welfare Trait: How State Benefits Affect Personality, By Adam Perkins, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

PASSIVE EUGENICS MADE SIMPLES..!

Many dating sites are advertised as being specifically for high-IQ individuals, but nobody calls those “eugenic dating sites” even though that is what they ultimately are. “Passive Eugenics” simply involves facilitating the meeting opportunities of men and women with the “right stuff”.   Even if subliminally, OA-City selection panels will almost certainly prioritise citizenship for those with the “right stuff” – good health, above average IQ, and even good looks.  This might sound unfair and elitist – even “fascist” to some – but eugenics will benefit all mankind in the long run, just as horse-breeding benefits horses.   Because the alternative to eugenics is what ALL welfare states are experiencing now, and that is DYSGENICS BY DEFAULT..!

Be honest – we all want our children to be both beautiful and smart, don’t we..?

EVERYONE WANTS AN ADVANTAGE IN LIFE

Before Hitler, Eugenics was a widely lauded idea which was championed in socialist Sweden, of all places.  But, post WW2, the idea became so objectionable that it is impossible to even mention it without someone accusing you of harbouring genocidal motives..!  This is a hysterical and deeply hypocritical stance since, if given the choice, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US – even leftists who froth at the mouth at the mere mention of such a “fascist” idea – want their children to be above-average in intelligence, health and physical appearance. 

We all want these advantages for ourselves and we want them even more for our children.  Nobody would ever choose to be born ugly or mentally retarded, physically deformed, with Downs Syndrome or a progressive crippling disease such as that endured by Professor Stephen Hawking for 50 years.

Passive Eugenics would not guarantee perfect offspring but would certainly make it FAR more likely that fewer children would be born with physical deformities and mental deficiencies.  Society would reap the benefits by not having to pay to support such unfortunates – or to pay for the incarceration of ever more criminals with “mental health issues”.

Only the foolish, the selfish, the smug, the narcissistic and the neurotic (all typical leftie traits) would condemn or oppose a simple idea that would improve the life prospects of future generations.

• REVERSAL of “DYSGENICS by DEFAULT” 

No civilised person wants to live in the vicinity of the sort of bad-mannered, uncouth, and loutish slobs – whose houses always have piles of junk and/or old cars outside – who are prone to shouting and screaming, window-breaking, drunken-ness, drug-dealing, honking vehicles full of noisy late night arrivals, raucous all-night parties, etc.  These days our towns and cities – and society in general – do not have strong rules of civic behaviour and the police and authorities increasingly turn a blind eye by dismissing such disturbances as “domestic disputes”.  Besides which, calling the police to sort out your bad neighbours will certainly bring hostility and probably physical retaliation at some later date.  Since moving house is such a costly business, most people in such situations bite their tongue hoping that their unruly neighbour will leave.   Those who can afford to – especially “champagne socialists” – separate themselves from the working class “riff-raff” by self-segregating themselves in “exclusive” suburbs.  

(It tends to be forgotten that “exclusive” means “to exclude” or to “to segregate”, aka “apartheid”, but “liberals” don’t want to know that).     

• A CHOSEN PEOPLE

OA-Cities would have no need to enshrine eugenic measures in law since citizens would be vetted and approved by an “immigration board”, so passive eugenics would then occur naturally. Single OA-Citizens would be encouraged to seek a partner from within their community, or at least a closely-allied one.  It would be advantageous to do so as any “outsider” partner would not be admitted automatically but would have to pass muster of the admission test just like everyone else.  

OA-Cities could be founded by consortiums (companies, clubs, churches, etc), groups of private individuals, or even a wealthy single individual who may choose to take a title such as Prince or Duke.  The administrative structure will be similar to that of a company, a trust, or a co-operative. Just as everyone does on their own private property (your virtual island) OA-Cities will be selective when choosing who to “allow aboard”, so to speak. Yes, they will “discriminate” as we all do in our own lives when choosing our friends, our life partners, our business partners, our employees, etc.  Aspiring citizens will have to apply and go through an interview process and medical check-up, just as one would expect to do when applying for a job.  As we all know, the better the job, the more thorough the interview and vetting process. When applicants are many but positions are few, employers naturally become more selective.  

OA-Cities will be few and applicants will be many, so why should it be any different..?  

If you owned a private island, wouldn’t you want to decide who is allowed to visit, and especially who is allowed to stayover..?