As illustrated by the examples below, EFFECTIVE wind turbines cannot be incorporated into conventional buildings as the power they generate is tiny compared to the power the buildings actually consume.
IMO, they are examples of “Green Virtue-Signalling”.
3 x 29m diameter wind turbines in Bahrain’s World Trade Centre building (2008) – see HERE for article.
More “Green Virtue-Signalling” (Strata SE1, London)
Tower height is perhaps the most important factor in the design of horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs). The wind blows faster at higher altitudes, free of surface drag and air viscosity. Doubling the height can increase wind speed by 20% to 60%, and even a 10% increase in wind speed will increase output by more than 30%.
Why litter the landscape with wind turbines when, if incorporated into Oasis-Cities they wouldn’t occupy any land and the power-source for each city module would be on-site, exactly where it is needed?
How could a LARGE wind-turbine be built-into an Oasis City? Its obvious that a pyramidal building’s sloping walls would make an ideal platform for Solar PV, but how could wind turbines be incorporated? I originally toyed with 2 ideas – #1) siting 4 medium sized turbine towers, one on each corner (bastion) of the plinth, where they would be more out in the open. #2) a dozen or so smaller turbines on rail bogies (as used in ports to move cranes about) on the podium wall, thus enabling them to be moved to the best position to catch the wind. Unfortunately, both ideas break the golden rule of wind-turbine siting – they should not be close to buildings that might block the wind or cause erratic wind flow. They would also interrupt the views and create noise, but most importantly they would not be high enough above ground.
A BETTER SOLUTION
If the central elevator pillar were extended skyward it could support a turbine with 30-50m long blades, giving a potential output of 2-5MW.
A wind turbine could “piggy-back” atop the central lift shaft, gaining “free height”, thus greatly increasing it’s efficiency and less affected by building-induced turbulence
This achieves several important objectives….
- Turbine is raised to a height of c.250m, thus greatly increasing its efficiency.
- The first 175m of the height is “free” as it sits atop the central lift-shaft.
- Wind flows smoothly and consistently, unaffected by turbulence
- Not directly attached to the building so it doesn’t stress the structure.
- Noise is carried horizontally away from the building.
Although this solution permits only ONE turbine per building, it would generate more power than several smaller turbines close to ground level, with far less visual and aural impact. The combined power output from solar PV and wind turbine could provide ALL the power needs of an OA-City module, especially when allowing for a 60-80% reduction in per-capita power usage, compared to energy-wasteful OB-Cities.
Of course, in order to go completely “off-grid” there would need to be a good power storage capacity – a goal that remains the “Holy Grail” of green energy.
Recent Comments