Hail the Prince..!
LOADED, BUT BORED..?
WHY NOT CREATE A PRINCIPALITY..!
Among the many exciting possibilities that could arise from the OA-City concept is the foundation of many city states, each with their own unique political system.
An individual wealthy enough to self-finance an OA-City could declare himself Prince of his very own tiny Principality, like Monaco or Liechtenstein.
Principality of Monaco flag
A CCOUNTRY IS MERELY A COMPANY WRIT LARGE
300 years ago much of Europe was a patchwork of mini-states – Kingdoms, Principalities, Duchies, Counties, Free Cities, Republics, and other entities. Although nominally part of the “Holy Roman Empire” (“not Holy, not Roman, not an Empire” as quipped Voltaire) they were effectively independent states. Life and liberty in those small states was probably much better and freer than in a big centrally-ruled absolute monarchy like France. Small states also facilitate more competition and innovation than large ones. In many ways a country is just a company writ large, and who – who believes in competition – wants a small handful of huge monopoly companies dominating everything? Yet that is the situation we find ourselves in with our giant (in terms of population) top-down centrally-ruled so-called “democracies”. If you hate the way your country is being run you can, in theory, move to another country and many have done just that. But the choice of decent countries is very limited and most of them are not very different politically – wasteful bureaucracies, welfare statism, and arrogant self-important leftist elitist “do-gooders” imposing politically-correctness, “diversity”, multi-culturalism, etc., on a virtually powerless and reluctant populace.
A CCOUNTRY IS MERELY A COMPANY WRIT LARGE
300 years ago much of Europe was a patchwork of mini-states – Kingdoms, Principalities, Duchies, Counties, Free Cities, Republics, and other entities. Although nominally part of the “Holy Roman Empire” (“not Holy, not Roman, not an Empire” as quipped Voltaire) they were effectively independent states. Life and liberty in those small states was probably much better and freer than in a big centrally-ruled absolute monarchy like France. Small states also facilitate more competition and innovation than large ones. In many ways a country is just a company writ large, and who – who believes in competition – wants a small handful of huge monopoly companies dominating everything? Yet that is the situation we find ourselves in with our giant (in terms of population) top-down centrally-ruled so-called “democracies”. If you hate the way your country is being run you can, in theory, move to another country and many have done just that. But the choice of decent countries is very limited and most of them are not very different politically – wasteful bureaucracies, welfare statism, and arrogant self-important leftist elitist “do-gooders” imposing politically-correctness, “diversity”, multi-culturalism, etc., on a virtually powerless and reluctant populace.
Prince Richard of Bransonia..?
Suppose that a famous entrepreneur like Richard Branson were to announce to the media…
“I am planning to establish a new COMPANY run as a co-operative. It will employ thousands of people, all of whom will be shareholders”
Given Richard Branson’s infectious enthusiasm and track record, such an announcement would generate a huge amount of positive publicity. But what if he were to change just TWO words and say instead….
“I am planning to establish a new COUNTRY run as a co-operative. It will HOUSE thousands of people, all of whom will be shareholders”
It would be a safe bet that many thousands of people would flock to apply for residence in Prince Richards realm. And, since a good businessman like our erstwhile Prince Richard would want to make his city charter appealing to prospective citizens, they would flock to his Principality without showing too much concern about what rules or political system he would impose on his subjects. Because it would make no economic sense for Prince Richard to impose unreasonable, unpopular, or unjust laws. Or, on the other hand, by admitting anyone who might not be an asset to his realm. A private company (as opposed to a government one) wouldn’t want to employ anyone who might be a burden on it, so why should a private country which (in this case) would be an Oasis City micro-state..?
This underscores the logical case that a hereditary ruler will tend to run his country in a much more responsible manner than would a so-called Democracy. Why? Because a monarch would want to look after the long-term interests of his realm and will thus usually make decisions with the long-term foremost in mind, and not be swayed by short-term political popularity. Democratic leaders are always focussed on the pressing need to “win the next election” and, as a result, are constantly tempted to make bad policy for short-term electoral expediency. “Democratic” leaders are impelled to recklessly weaken the states institutions and finances in order to satisfy their selfish short-term ambition of “staying in power”.
But the very thought of relinquishing control over even a soccer pitch-sized piece of land is regarded by narrow-minded “nationalists” as a “shameful” loss of so-called “territorial integrity”. So, whilst nation states remain dominated by such narrow-minded thinking, potential princes will have to wait patiently in the wings.
For now, the idea of founding a new country sounds an impossible dream but – since we are only talking of leasing a tiny parcel of land (perhaps 10km2) – I am hopeful that, in the near future, territorial leases will become a politically acceptable and even routine practice, as it once was.
“Democracy”, widely considered to be the well-spring of freedom, is another barrier to the new freedoms that OAeCities could potentially bring forth. Opposition parties will try to derail any agreement to lease territory, no doubt citing the usual “loss of territorial integrity” bogeyman.
The first country to breach this stubborn nationalistic irrationality will most likely be a poor and largely forgotten place such as PARAGUAY – one that would welcome the investment, the local employment, the publicity, and the prestige that would come from hosting an Oasis City.
Don’t bother asking these sort of guys to lease part of their territories
Let the River of Freedom flow freely..!Before anything like this can happen – this narrow-minded nationalistic log-jam – the abject fear of relinquishing control over even the tiniest slice of territory – must first be cleared for this river of freedom to flow. If just a single country were to overcome this fear, then a hundred others will soon follow..!!!
Let the River of Freedom flow freely..!
Before anything like this can happen – this narrow-minded nationalistic log-jam – the abject fear of relinquishing control over even the tiniest slice of territory – must first be cleared for this river of freedom to flow. If just a single country were to overcome this fear, then a hundred others will soon follow..!!!
Leave a Reply