[stextbox id=”black” caption=”Is Diversity OUR GREATEST STRENGTH..? “]“Some ideas are so absurdly ridiculous – and so obviously false – that only intellectuals (or other highly-intelligent people) actually believe in them.” George Orwell (paraphrased). The claim that “Diversity is our greatest strength” is a classic example.
DIE-VERSITY
“an even greater irony is that if “diversity” really were a strength, it would have to mean that people of different races actually are different. Otherwise, how could mixing “diverse” people be an advantage? If we are all the same, there are no benefits to mixing. According to diversity theory we must persist in believing that we are all the same and interchangeable, but still benefit enormously from mixing. As a practical matter, promoting diversity is just an excuse for anti-white policies.The peecee social engineers and politicos who regularly prescribe 3M for rich northern whites (because we are all cold-hearted money-making machines lacking empathy with our poorer darker cousins) insist that we desperately need to “immerse” our culture in Die-versity in order to reap the benefits of (presumably warm-hearted) poorer but fun-loving southern folk, the more so if they are of the fashionable darker persuasion.”
GREEKS for EXAMPLE
I love the country, the food, the islands, the villages, etc, but I have reservations about Greeks themselves – esp their macho “chip-on-shoulder” menfolk and their boisterously noisy seemingly undisciplined children. And not only Greeks – all Mediterraneans behave in similar fashion.
The singular advantage of 3M immigration that I can think of (but is never mentioned) – that of getting my lecherous white hands on some of the often remarkably voluptuous Greek women – is denied me by overtly “protective” (read “selfishly jealous”) menfolk who will not permit “their women” any contact with foreign males – an attitude which can only be interpreted as racism, except that it never is.
Furthermore this “protectionist” attitude is only relaxed (if at all) very slowly and over several generations when they become part of the 3M social experiment.
MOSLEMS are FAR WORSE
But Greek men become angels when compared with their muslim counterparts.
Here is a religion and culture that seems to possess no word for peaceful assimilation or compromise or moderation.
In Islam there is no distinction between peaceful immigration and warlike invasion – 2 strategies which are different sides of the same coin. When Islam was militarily stronger than the west (until the late 17th century) they did not hesitate to attack and enslave us (yes!!!). As we became stronger we also attacked them, but only because they attacked us first. But we NEVER sought to enslave them.
QUESTIONS NEVER ASKED
Shouldn’t all experiments (and especially social-engineering) first be carried out on a small scale to determine whether they really work, or could be dangerous? I am always in favour of scientific and social advance but surely experiments need to be performed alongside controls? After which the results should be analysed, studied and debated before mass implementation? To rush headlong into 3M seems to be not only a case of putting cart before horse, but not knowing how big or heavy the cart is, or even whether it has any wheels fitted..!!
Are we supposed to adapt to their beliefs or they to ours? Who is to be “assimilated” and culturally absorbed – us or them? If the latter what was the point of 3M in the first place?
And if we adapt to them, wont they (the immigrants) lose their beneficial culturally-enriching?
or is it intended to be an absolutely equal exchange?
Or is it that both sides are supposed to equally assimilate? Won’t both parties then lose their identity?
Is any of this possible or likely or desirable?
Given the wholesale application and administration of 3M – isn’t the west attempting to commit “cultural suicide”?
YES – because our culture is inherently, subliminally, institutionally, and irredeemably “RACIST”
What is so wrong with us (whites) that we (and not them) need 3M?
YES – 3M is the “cure” for racism, a social disease which (it is implied) only affects whites.
What is it about OMOV democracy that so many politicians (of all parties) profess to believe in 3M, even when they know that most of their electorate are not comfortable with the policy or, at the very least, do not like the speed with which 3M is being administered?
The short and single answer is – the horrendous fear of being labelled a “racist”.
If the ultimate purpose of 3M is to forge a new 3M people with a new 3M culture, might we be exchanging cultures which “work” (altho in different ways and on different levels) for a new homogenized one with totally unknown qualities?
If they assimilate more with us then, like adding cream to coffee or water to flour, we will be forced to continue mixing until the mixture is “right”.
If we become more like them (which is what the Muslims expect and demand) then
Is it efficacious and good for me to have to tolerate noisy neighbours?
Wouldn’t it be better all round if we encouraged more exchange students?
MUSLIM VEILS & HEADSCARFS, etc
On the matter of headwear in school it sounds very reasonable to allow the female children of Muslims to have freedom of choice in this matter. But with Muslims it doesnt work like that because Islam, first and foremost, is a religion of force and fear and intolerance. If the authorities back down on their usual “no headware in class” rule and “permit” Muslim girls (who anyway have no choice in the matter) to cover their heads, then very soon ALL MUSLIM girls (even those with “liberal” parents) will have to wear it. This is due to peer INTIMIDATION.
THE COMING SHOWDOWN WITH ISLAM
It is utterly naive to think (as I am sure the 3emmers do) that this can be averted by appeasement and pandering to muslim “sensitivities”, of which there are many. Allowing members of this INDIGESTIBLE culture to mass immigrate, and to freely practice and proselytize their hate-filled religion is to court disaster. If there were to be full-scale war with radical Islam (in the guise of a massive escalation of terrorist attacks against the west) and the states which secretly nurture and protect the terrorists – whose side would British or French muslims be on? Would they be with us or them? I think we all know the answer to that one. So, will we round them all up and impound them on the IOM for the duration of the war, as we did with resident German aliens in WW2?
In such a scenario – with massive civilian deaths from sneak chemical, biological, or nuclear terrorist attacks – it is no good pretending that this Islamic “fifth column” that we have allowed to breed and multiply within our midst can remain neutral. In war you cannot be NEUTRAL – to be neutral means to deny assistance to either side and not offer your help against those attacking your adopted country. To be neutral is such a situation is, in reality, to favour the enemy. To favour the enemy means that you are a TRAITOR. This is the very scary corner we have backed ourselves into, because of a naive belief in 3M.
AMERICA’S JAPANESE IN WW2
America is often criticised for impounding its Japanese citizens in WW2 –
AUSTRALIA – 3M SUCCESS STORY?
Australians, uniquely I would say, are largely very enthusiastic about Mc. But if you were to ask Australians what they most like about it they wouldn’t say “the opportunity to mix and make friends with people of many different cultures” – they wouldn’t even think of that aspect unless pressed to say something PC – but “all the restaurants and new kinds of food”. White A’s dont “mix” with other cultures, and the other cultures dont mix with them, any more than white B’s do. Of course the children do, but thats only because in school they have no choice. The 3M propagandists love to point out that children, unlike many of their naughty parents, dont harbour “racist” attitudes and they naively hope that they will remain that way and given a few generations of ethnic mixing the entire population will be multi-racial and non-racist. (Note the implication once again that only whites are inclined to racism and only whites CAN be racist). The real reason that children dont harbour “racist attitudes” is that they simply DONT KNOW ENOUGH. You could equally point out that they dont harbour strong attitudes about oral sex and all sorts of things which are important to adults.
Other reasons why Mc “works” in Australia –
1) Low population density – No space pressure
2) Few black immigrants – and generally good education and qualifications of those that have
3) Relatively few moslems – and ditto
4) General wealth and abundance
5) Physical distance from world troublespots
COULD AUSTRALIA BECOME A CHINESE COLONY?
In the present reasonably stable geo-political situation this may seem a far-fetched idea, but anyone who knows anything about history and the rise and fall of nations should be warned against complacency. For example, much of Spain was under Muslim Arab control for 800 years, and Spain has only been largely Christian for less than that period. The region historically known as Anatolia is under the control of Turkey and peopled by Muslim Turks (a central Asian people) – yet this was the cradle of Christianity for well over 1000 years. Everyone has heard of the 1066 Battle of Hastings, but how many know of the disastrous Byzantine defeat at the 1078 Battle of Manzikert which first opened the gates of Anatolia to the Moslem hordes?
And how many people in Western Europe (barring Greece) remember that until 1923 the Mediterranean coast of western Turkey (the part which receives most tourists today) was populated by Christian Greeks rather than Muslim Turks? And much of what is now Poland was part of Germany till 1945. There are hundreds other examples, most of them forgotten except by historians, where entire countries and regions have undergone complete ethnic change within a short period.
For the last 20 years or longer A has deliberately sought most of its immigrants from Asia, particularly China and its offshoots.
This is a foolishly shortsighted policy given the facts about China –
1) Run by unelected and insecure communist thugs and bullies who in 1989 slaughtered thousands of peaceful protesters
2) Within 10 years it may be the worlds biggest economy
3) Within 20 years it may be the strongest military power and have the ability to project that power
4) For many years China has been threatening to re-unite (ie, invade) Taiwan.
4) China will never accept an independent Taiwan
Sooner or later there will be a war over Taiwan which will draw in America and A
5) Therefore A, despite all its attempts at appeasement and fence-sitting, is pre-destined to become a mortal enemy of China
6) By which time China will have several million of its people in A
7) This Chinese 5th column will be forced to choose sides
8) Blood being thicker than water many will openly (or secretly) support China’s territorial ambitions
9) In a war situation Australia may have to take harsh measures (internment?) against this enemy within
10) This will give China an excuse to invade A in order to protect “their people” being oppressed by A
11) As Hitler did with Czechoslovakia (on behalf of the Sudetenland Germans), the Chinese troops will be “invited in”.
TRAVEL – THE TRUE MULTI-CULTURAL EXPERIENCE
It is often said (quite correctly in my opinion) that “travel is the best education”.
When we travel to another country we become (in varying degrees) guests of their people and we are able to “experience” the culture in its original and authentic setting. This is especially true if we stay with a local family, where we can learn of their food and their social customs and even some of their language. To pretend that by importing groups of people from different parts of the world and placing them in a multi-cultural disneyland of our making we can learn much, if anything, about their cultures is foolishly improbable. In the process of being transplanted into an alien environment they change. True, if enough come, they form their own little communities over here, but it can never be the same.
This is no more realistic than a trip to the zoo can be compared with a journey thru the Amazon rainforest for example.
Of course it will be argued that extensive international travel or the chance to become an exchange student is only available to a privileged minority.
This may well be true, but on the other hand – given that the fervently claimed justification for 3M is the establishment of a multi-cultural community leading to the cultural education or re-education of the multiculturally-starved white populace –
1) how much opportunity (never mind desire) do British whites (for example) have to intermingle with (say) Muslim families in this Englistan?
2) in terms of actual cultural exchange, how much transmission is there, compared to the experience of actually visiting a moslem country?
In my opinion – and for a whole bunch of reasons – very little and whatever so-called “cultural exchange” that goes on would be of quite a different nature given the enormous differences between the lives of British Pakistanis (say) compared to their countrymen back home.
This is why I believe 3M is a FRAUD
Unless wholesale invasion (and even then) the minute they leave their country and move into ours many aspects of their culture are left behind for good and others have to quickly adapt to the new circumstances. Migrants from non-English speaking countries (with the notable exception of those from North Europe) tend to create or move into “ethnic enclaves” where they can mix with “their own people”, continue speaking their own language, and find shops and services and places of worship, etc, catering to their cultural needs and roots.
In this manner they attempt to re-create the country which they left behind, but it can never be more than a poor copy of the original because not only is the climate completely different, so is the physical infrastructure and the population whether in city or country, is far more low density. Much more importantly the social norms and the media are far more liberal and able to express opinions which, back home, would be heretical, rebellious, even traitorous. And the “ethnic enclave” tends to be shared with other newcomers who may have a similar culture in some ways but a different religion (hinduism or christian mostly). And finally the so-called “EE” probably also contains quite a few residual “natives”, usually lower working-class whites or retirees, some of whom might be resentful or even hostile towards the foreign invasion.
Such influences are impossible to ignore and they create a lot of friction within the families of the newcomers particularly if they are MUSLIM who carry the baggage of their very powerful and oppressive religion, and who resist change and integration more than any other group.
Is this a good or a bad thing for them and us?
It should be apparent that, in the warped minds of the multiculturalists, they would much prefer the indigestible Muslims or the Africans as the cultural “tutors” of our children rather than any Europeans from north or south – simply becuse the latter groups integrate far more quickly and easily.
A SELF PERPETUATING RELIGION
The Moslem attitude towards women, “their women”, is a case in point.
Moslems, esp the women, have “arranged marriages” with their overseas brethren, thus bringing more of their indigestible kind into the country and further ensuring that any children will also be M. Not that the rapid expansion in M numbers needs to be “ensured”. When a M male marries an infidel woman, there is never any doubt or question that his wife will convert and that all offspring are also M. Same when an infidel male marries a M female.
And the penalty for leaving Islam (apostasy) is death, as is the penalty for “blasphemy”. Surprise, huh?